IP Blog
expert witness
Plain and Ordinary Meaning Requires More Than a Mere Capability
The Eastern District of Texas has granted-in-part Defendant HTC’s motion to strike expert testimony based on application of improper legal principles, to wit, the expert had improperly extended the plain and ordinary meaning of claims of U.S. Pat. No. 5,802,467 to encompass a mere capability to do the thing. Salazar v. HTC Corp., Civil No. 2:16-cv-01096-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. May 2,...